One standard, applied identically every time
Five dimensions, a four-tier evidence ladder, a documented confidence overlay — applied the same way every quarter. That is what makes one score comparable to another.
AI spend is accelerating faster than our ability to realise its value. We measure what your portfolio has returned, benchmark it against your peers, and give you one quarterly decision: where the next dollar goes, and where capital can be released.
Illustrative. Replace with client-verified benchmark data before launch.
01 — The Value Test
Not measurement questions — capital allocation questions. The ones a CFO already answers for every other class of spend. AI is the last category without a shared way to answer them.
How well can your executive team confidently answer the following questions today?
0 of 6 answered
Six questions. One standard. The same answer format every quarter, so the Board reads a trend rather than a fresh argument.
02 — The problem
Every enterprise can tell you its AI spend to the dollar. Almost none can tell the Board what changed in the business because of it. That distance is the AI value gap — and it is widening.
Counted every month
Rarely measured at all
03 — The firm
We build the AI Value Realisation Platform™ — software that registers every AI investment, scores what it returned, benchmarks it against anonymised peers, and generates the board pack. We hold no build revenue and no vendor margin, so the only number we have an interest in is the one that survives scrutiny.
Finance and transformation have a system for realising value. AI has been run on hope. We built the missing method — run by software, every quarter.
Every claimed benefit is discounted for what the AI caused, whether it recurs, and how well it is evidenced. The gap between claimed and evidenced is usually the most useful number in the report.
Value that never reaches a board pack is an anecdote. We measure to a standard a CFO will sign — the same way, every quarter.
04 — The flagship
A standing ninety-minute session, every quarter, on one agenda: what the portfolio returned, what scales, what stops. The platform does the work, so the session is spent deciding rather than assembling. Not an assessment you commission — a rhythm you adopt.
What you buy is the ability to walk into a board meeting four times a year with a defensible account of where the AI money went and what it bought.
The AI Board™ adds senior experts to the room for organisations that want independent challenge as well as evidence.
One standard. One score. One quarterly rhythm — from your first AI pilot to an enterprise-wide portfolio.
The standard we measure against
Financial investment has accounting standards. Cloud spend has FinOps. AI investment has had nothing — no shared definition of value, and no way to compare one claim against another.
The AI Value Standard™ is that definition. Five scored dimensions — revenue, cost, productivity, risk and customer. A four-tier evidence ladder, and a confidence overlay that discounts a score by the strength of the evidence behind it.
Applied identically every time — which is what makes one score comparable to another.
How value is defined, evidenced and scored. Works from a single organisation’s first assessment, and it is what practitioners are certified against.
What the Standard produces at scale. Every assessment contributes anonymised data, answering what no single assessment can: how do we compare to our sector?
The Index is building, and we say so plainly. Founding Benchmark Partners help establish it — and receive their sector cut first.
05 — The decision the review exists to make
Most AI portfolios are not short of ideas. They are short of the room to fund them, because capital is still committed to initiatives that have not returned. Releasing it is the fastest source of AI funding most organisations have.
Every initiative carries an explicit disposition, measured against the Standard. Four of the five say continue. The fifth releases the money.
The same three questions for every initiative. What did it return? How well can you prove it? What did it cost? The answers decide the disposition — not the loudest sponsor.
06 — What the review delivers
Five dimensions, a four-tier evidence ladder, a documented confidence overlay — applied the same way every quarter. That is what makes one score comparable to another.
Scorecards measuring what matters: revenue, productivity, cost, risk and customer. AI measured by business outcomes, not technology activity.
Benchmark your performance against anonymised peers in your sector. The AI Value Index™ is building; founding contributors receive the sector cut first.
Five dispositions — scale, verify, refine, hold, stop. No initiative leaves the review without one, and the evidence sits on the page.
Board-ready reporting generated by the platform, not assembled by hand — same structure every quarter, so directors read a trend.
The AI Board™ puts senior experts in the room for the review. A premium option on top of the platform.
A repeatable operating rhythm
Capture business outcomes and value realised.
Compare performance against internal targets and industry peers.
Identify where to invest, optimise, scale or stop.
Review investment decisions through structured executive governance.
Execute agreed actions and continuously increase value realised.
Then repeat. Quarter after quarter. Investment after investment.
Built to scale
The review scales from one business unit to an enterprise portfolio, because the standard — not the consultant — carries the quality. As the network grows, so does the benchmark behind every recommendation.
Not another dashboard. Not another consulting report. A standing, independent discipline that helps organisations maximise the return on every AI investment.
07 — How the method works
Six stages, run in sequence, the same way every time. Each produces an artefact the next one builds on — so every engagement is repeatable and every result comparable.
Establish the true position of the AI portfolio, spend and capability.
Tie every investment to a business outcome an executive owns.
Instrument value, not activity. Agree the scorecard before the spend.
Reallocate. Stop what is not returning. Fund what is.
Convert capability into P&L movement and enterprise capability.
Give the Board a defensible account of value, every quarter.
08 — What we cover
Our experts work across the four places value is won or lost — investment, cost, leadership and operating model — as one discipline.
Prioritisation, business cases and decision rights, tracked in one view. Where the money goes, who owns the outcome, and what it returned.
Cost transparency, unit economics and value measurement — the live scorecard and benchmarks, with the discipline to hold them.
Capability, decision-making and the human side of adoption. Most AI value is lost here, quietly — we make it visible.
Process, structure and ways of working. Turning AI capability into how the organisation actually runs, day to day.
09 — Insights
What the enterprises actually realising value are doing differently — and how far ahead of the median they are.
Coming soonThe three assumptions that appear in almost every AI investment case, and why none of them hold.
Coming soonA one-page instrument for directors who need to test the investment without testing the technology.
Coming soonThe Founding Benchmark Programme
Twenty organisations, helping establish the AI Value Index™. Founding partners receive a full assessment at founding pricing, quarterly reassessment for twelve months, and first access to the sector benchmark — in exchange for anonymised data and feedback on the method. Not free, by design: priced well below market rate, because contributors commit.
Apply to become a design partner →